Casso

Compare

Casso vs SlimSnap

SlimSnap focuses on marking elements and handing agents structured data instead of opaque pixels. Casso focuses on numbered screen regions, annotated composites, and a lean paste-into-any-agent prompt - with a desktop overlay that works on any screen.

Summary

Both aim at better agent handoff than a naked PNG. Pick SlimSnap if you want free Mac structured JSON capture. Pick Casso if you want numbered multi-region annotations, optional auto-paste, and an agent-agnostic clipboard workflow with a simple one-time license.

Side by side

DimensionCassoSlimSnap
Core modelNumbered regions + notes + prompt.md + imagesMark element + intent → structured JSON + frames
Multi-region feedbackNatural: [1], [2], [3] on one compositeStrong for precise single-element marks
Price7-day free trial / $29 one-timeFree (Mac)
WindowsSame license; Windows app shippingMac-first; Windows in progress per their docs
Cloud / LLMNo upload; no LLM inside CassoLocal-oriented capture for agent handoff

Choose Casso when

  • You often mark several related UI regions in one pass.
  • You want auto-paste into a CLI agent and a consistent prompt format.
  • You want one paid tool that covers Mac and Windows under one license.

Choose SlimSnap when

  • You want a free Mac-only tool optimized for structured element export.
  • Your flow is atomic one-element fixes with JSON for the agent.

FAQ

Related

Try Casso free for 7 days

Numbered screen annotations for Claude Code, Codex, and other agents. 7-day free trial, then $29 once - not a subscription.